News

Prime-Promoting Flea & Tick Collar Linked To A number of Pet Deaths, Diseases

As a result of fleas and ticks show greater than a minor nuisance to our dogs, there are a lot of merchandise on the market aimed toward retaining them away. Nevertheless, some flea and tick collars that launch pesticides onto your pet can truly be harmful themselves.

The pesticide utilized in Seresto collars is meant to kill fleas, ticks, and other pests whereas being secure for dogs and cats to put on. They’re designed to work for eight months, releasing small quantities of pesticide at a time. Seresto collars could also be a top-seller on Amazon, however there have been a number of accidents and even pet deaths linked to them.

@elanconzpets/Instagram

Many devastated mother and father and anxious specialists need motion and solutions.

The Harmful Results Of Sure Pesticides On Pets

Not solely does the EPA have data of well being points brought on by Seresto, however dozens of Amazon clients have additionally issued complaints. Many have reported the collar inflicting pores and skin rashes, and others say they led to neurological points of their pets, like seizures and tremors.

Karen Kay via Facebook

This drawback isn’t with out precedent both. The NRDC (Nationwide Sources Protection Council) filed a petition in opposition to the EPA over a decade in the past over its approval of a distinct pesticide, tetrachlorvinphos. That pesticide has been linked to most cancers and mind improvement points in kids.

In response to EPA documents, from 1992 to 2008, they obtained about 4,600 incident stories relating to pet collars containing tetrachlorvinphos, together with 363 deaths. The EPA determined to not ban it, and it’s nonetheless utilized in Hartz Ultraguard pet collars.

Some specialists additionally say incidents could also be under-reported as a result of many mother and father don’t join the collar to the problems. Nathan Donley, a senior scientist on the Middle for Organic Variety and an skilled on U.S. pesticide regulation, mentioned:

“More often than not, individuals are not going to make the connection or they’re not going to take an hour or so out of the day and work out the right way to name and spend time on maintain.”

Dad and mom who’ve misplaced dogs or skilled well being points resulting from Seresto collars have fashioned a Facebook group. In the event you’re amongst them, it is best to report your story to the EPA.

Regardless of Proof, The EPA Has Not Issued Any Warning About Seresto

The Environmental Safety Company is liable for regulating merchandise that comprise pesticides. Developed by Bayer and now bought by Elanco, Seresto collars have been accredited by the EPA on March 16, 2012.

Bayer, the corporate that developed the collars, performed eight companion animal security research trying on the impact of Seresto collars. These research are what the EPA used to approve Seresto, regardless of The California Division of Pesticide Regulation questioning the validity of two of the research.

dog-scratching

Karen McCormack, a retired EPA worker who labored each as a scientist and communications officer, expressed concern over the EPA’s response:

“The EPA seems to be turning a blind eye to this drawback, and after seven years of an growing variety of incidents, they’re telling the general public that they’re persevering with to watch the state of affairs. However I feel it is a vital drawback that must be addressed sooner fairly than later.”

Donley additionally added:

“The truth that EPA has not accomplished something to alert the general public that there is perhaps a difficulty right here, it strikes me as bordering on prison. The EPA has this method in place to compile data and it’s simply amassing mud in some database.”

The EPA And Producer Defend Seresto’s Continued Sale

Regardless of the deaths and diseases, the EPA says knowledge signifies the collars are nonetheless eligible for registration. When reached for remark, an EPA spokesperson mentioned in an emailed assertion:

“No pesticide is totally with out hurt, however EPA ensures that there are measures on the product label that scale back danger. The product label is the regulation, and applicators should comply with label instructions. Some pets, nevertheless, like some people, are extra delicate than others and will expertise antagonistic signs after therapy.”

A spokesperson for Elanco mentioned the corporate takes product security very severely. She went on to clarify:

“Remember the fact that the existence of an antagonistic occasion report doesn’t essentially imply the product brought about the issue. Causality between the noticed indicators and the usage of the product is evaluated on a case-by-case foundation. That mentioned, each antagonistic occasion collected, no matter causality, is reported to the authorities.”

You probably have issues, look into different flea and tick prevention methods. Keep away from danger and defend your pet.

H/T: USA Today

Show More

Related Articles

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Back to top button